The 90 days is a number from Department of State guidance, and USCIS weighs circumstances rather than dates.
People who came to the United States on a B-2 visitor visa or without a visa under the Visa Waiver Program (ESTA) and then married a U.S. citizen ask whether they must wait until 90 days have passed before they can apply for a green card. But this number is not a USCIS filing rule, and passing the 90-day mark does not make the review any lighter.
The 90-day rule is Department of State guidance that looks at conduct after entering the United States
"The Department of State's Foreign Affairs Manual gives, as an example of conduct inconsistent with visitor status, a person who came in visitor status marrying a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident and taking up residence in the United States."
Visitor status is a status that allows a person to stay only for tourism or visiting purposes. The 90-day rule is a standard in the work guidance, the Foreign Affairs Manual (9 FAM), that the Department of State, which issues visas at U.S. embassies and consulates abroad, gives to its consular officers.
According to the guidance, if a person engages in conduct inconsistent with visitor status within 90 days after applying for the visa, or after entering the United States, the consular officer may start from the assumption that the person lied when obtaining the visa or entering. This is called a presumption (the presumption of willful misrepresentation), and in the law this kind of lie is called a misrepresentation.
The guidance also gives, as other examples, working without authorization while in visitor status and enrolling in a school where that is not permitted. Whether a person has taken up residence is judged from records such as a long-term lease, a loan taken out to buy a home, utility bills in the person's own name, and a U.S. driver's license.
A presumption is not a conclusion. The guidance states clearly that later conduct that differs from what a person first said is not automatically treated as a lie, and the consular officer must give the applicant an opportunity to rebut it. However, the burden of overcoming a presumption created by conduct within 90 days is on the applicant, so the applicant must show that his or her real intent at entry was consistent with the purpose of a visit. After 90 days, there is no such presumption, and whether there was a lie is decided by looking at the evidence, the same as in any other case.
It also matters that what the guidance looks at is conduct, not the application. Adjustment of status is the process of changing to permanent resident status inside the United States, and filing a green card application (Form I-485) is itself the application for adjustment of status. The guidance states that the mere fact of filing an application to change to another status, or an application for adjustment of status, is not enough to create the presumption. Even if the application was filed after 90 days, if the marriage and taking up residence in the United States happened within 90 days, the conduct the guidance looks at has already occurred.
USCIS is not bound by a 90-day date
"The USCIS Policy Manual states that conduct inconsistent with status is not in itself a misrepresentation. But it says that such evidence may lead to a reasonable, common-sense conclusion that the applicant may be inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation, especially if the conduct occurred soon after the visa interview or entry."
The Policy Manual is the work guide that USCIS, which reviews green card applications filed inside the United States, gives to its officers. Its current text contains no fixed 90-day line and says to examine the applicant's circumstances carefully. Here, being inadmissible means that a person who is inside the United States cannot receive a green card unless he or she obtains a waiver.
So marrying or filing on day 91 does not guarantee safety. Plans held only in one's mind do not amount to misrepresentation. Misrepresentation is judged from what a person said and submitted to U.S. officials, such as on a visa application or at inspection on entry, so if the person hid marriage plans and answered differently at that time, it is a problem even after 90 days have passed. Nor is a case hopeless just because the marriage took place within 90 days. If the person can show how things happened, that the purpose at entry was truly a visit and the plans changed afterward, the decision may be different.
The Policy Manual states that when an officer suspects misrepresentation based on evidence, the applicant must prove at least one of the following: that nothing contrary to the facts was said, that it was not willful, that it was not a fact important enough to affect the outcome, that it was not said to obtain an immigration benefit, or that it was not said to a U.S. government official. If the evidence on both sides is about equal, the applicant is treated as not having proven it.
The May USCIS memo gives heavy weight to not leaving as planned
"The May 21 USCIS policy memo states that failing to comply with the conditions of admission and failing to depart as planned are highly relevant to deciding whether to grant adjustment of status and are connected to an intent to live in the United States permanently. It said this is especially so if permanent residence could have been achieved through the normal immigrant visa process (entering after obtaining an immigrant visa outside the United States)."
Even when the requirements are met, adjustment of status is something USCIS decides whether to grant by weighing various circumstances, and this is called discretion. The May memo re-emphasized this point and said to treat acting inconsistently with the purpose of visitor status, or not leaving as planned, as negative factors in the discretionary decision. The memo is not aimed only at marriage cases but concerns adjustment of status in general, and it does not mention 90 days.
The May memo says that to overcome such negative factors, an applicant may need to show unusual or outstanding favorable circumstances. It also states that the mere absence of negative factors does not amount to such circumstances. However, USCIS does not reach a conclusion from a single factor. It weighs all favorable and unfavorable factors together, such as family ties, immigration status and history, and conduct, and when it denies an application in its discretion, it must state the reasons in writing in the denial notice.
The path of applying inside the United States is itself open. The law and regulations treat unauthorized work, failure to maintain status, and entry under the Visa Waiver Program as grounds that bar adjustment of status, but they exempt the close family members of U.S. citizens (such as spouses), whom immigration law calls immediate relatives. So the spouse of a U.S. citizen can apply for a green card inside the United States even if the permitted stay has expired or the person entered without a visa. But this exception does not also remove a misrepresentation problem. The spouse of a lawful permanent resident is not an immediate relative under immigration law, so this exception does not apply.
Rather than counting days, make what you said at entry and your later records line up
"Immigration law provides that a noncitizen who, by fraud or by willfully misrepresenting a material fact, has obtained or sought to obtain a visa, admission, or other immigration benefit is inadmissible."
First, check the purpose of the visit and the plans for the stay that you wrote on the visa or ESTA application, and the questions you were asked and the answers you gave at inspection on entry.
Next, organize dated records that show how your plans changed. These include a return flight reservation, records about a job or school in your home country, and communications showing when the two of you decided to marry. If there are records showing that a wedding date had already been set before entry, you should consider in advance how those records will be read at the USCIS green card interview.
At the interview, you must answer the questions asked truthfully. The Policy Manual treats simply not volunteering something that was not asked as not, by itself, a misrepresentation. But if the evidence clearly shows that something was knowingly and deliberately concealed, it is treated as a misrepresentation. Even if something contrary to the facts was said, correcting it on your own before it comes to light is treated as though there had been no misrepresentation (a timely retraction). However, the Policy Manual accepts such a correction only in the same proceeding in which the statement was made, so correcting a statement made at inspection on entry months later in the green card process does not erase it. Admitting it only after USCIS has questioned whether the statement was true is not treated as a correction either. On the other hand, correcting it while answering a question the officer asked in the same proceeding to give an opportunity to explain or correct may be accepted as a correction.
If a misrepresentation is found, the person becomes inadmissible with no time limit. To obtain a waiver, the applicant must show that a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse or parent would suffer extreme hardship if the applicant were refused admission, and hardship to the applicant or the applicant's children is not the standard (the case is different for victims of domestic violence who apply on their own, without the spouse). Whether to grant a waiver is also discretionary, and courts cannot review that decision. People who enter under the Visa Waiver Program give up, at the time of entry, the right to contest removal except by applying for asylum. So if their application is denied, they have almost no way to contest it in immigration court.
Closing thoughts
There are three things to do now. First, check your visa or ESTA application and the questions and answers at entry, write them down, and see whether the purpose of the visit you stated then conflicts with your current marriage and residence. Second, gather dated records showing when and how your plans changed after entry and organize them in order. Third, if you said anything contrary to the facts at entry, before filing the green card application first determine whether it amounts to a misrepresentation and whether a waiver is needed. What the review looks at, more than the date, is whether what you said at entry and your later records are consistent with each other.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. If I came on a tourist visa and got married, do I have to wait 90 days before applying for a green card?
No. The 90-day rule is Department of State guidance that looks at conduct after entering the United States, and it is not a USCIS filing rule. The current text of the USCIS Policy Manual contains no fixed 90-day line. It says to give more weight to conduct the sooner it occurs after entry, but to examine the applicant's circumstances carefully.
Q. Is there no problem if I marry after 90 days have passed since entry?
Day 91 does not guarantee safety. Misrepresentation is judged from what a person said and submitted to U.S. officials, such as on a visa application or at inspection on entry, so if you hid marriage plans and answered differently at that time, it is a problem even after 90 days have passed. On the other hand, if you can show how things happened, that the purpose at entry was truly a visit and your plans changed afterward, the decision may be different.
Q. If I entered without a visa (ESTA) and married a U.S. citizen, can I apply for a green card inside the United States?
The spouse of a U.S. citizen is an immediate relative, so you can apply inside the United States even if you entered without a visa or your permitted stay has expired. However, this exception does not also remove a misrepresentation problem, and the May 21 USCIS policy memo said to give heavy weight in the discretionary decision to not leaving as planned. A person who entered without a visa entered having given up the right to contest removal except by applying for asylum, so if the application is denied, there is almost no way to contest it in immigration court.
Disclaimer: This column provides general information and is not legal advice for a particular case. Individual immigration matters should be discussed with a qualified immigration attorney.
Law Office of Jin D. Cho, P.C.
NEW YORK OFFICE (Flushing) 35-24 154th Street, Flushing, NY 11354
(T) 718-353-2699 (F) 718-353-8132
NEW JERSEY OFFICE 560 Sylvan Avenue, 3Fl., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
(T) 201-449-0009
choattorneys.com | Marriage green card online: greencard4spouse.com